FDA standards for transparent supply chain processes

FDA Imposes a Broader Standard, Ensuring Transparency Into the Supply Chain Process

Table of Contents

Last Updated

The supply chain process includes food production, its processing distribution, consumption, and disposal. Therefore, food producers now adhere to the requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 

Food safety is essential when it comes to food production. It is one of the primary reasons the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was introduced in 2011. Its implementation allowed FDA to impose broader standards, ensuring transparency in the supply chain process. 

For over a decade, under FSMA, food safety requirements have been kept in check. This allows all food producers to understand the importance of manufacturing and packing food products. However, it is equally necessary to understand that food safety is FDA’s topmost priority. By imposing broader standards, the FDA highlights the necessity of food product safety. In addition, it is being achieved by introducing new methods of ensuring food traceability.  

Agtech digitization and automation

The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) spread a progression of straightforward procedures to forestall pollution of food items at all focuses, specifically in the supply chain. The FDA proposes to execute specific prerequisites, fulfilling the requirements and adhering to them as enlisted in the Food Traceability List (FTA). The FTL comprises food that the FDA considers bearing the most significant risk to customers, in light of models like a recurrence of a flare-up, seriousness of the disease, probability of tainting, and potential for microbe development.

The current regulation requires that elements in the food business have the option to proclaim from where they purchased something and to whom they straightforwardly sold it. The execution of Rule 204 would force a much more extensive norm, recognizing exact things that should be followed by everybody who contacts them.

The revealing prerequisite is comparatively severe as to time. Where it could have recently taken food makers and vendors as long as ten days to get to that degree of detail, they will presently be expected to answer in 24 hours or less. Moreover, notwithstanding FDA’s solicitation for a deferral, the organization will probably present the new rule to a government judge in November of this current year, so it will go through the most common way of being systematized into regulation.

The standard, whenever carried out as proposed, gives an elegance time of two years inside which organizations incapable of supplying the expected data wouldn’t be dependent upon penalties. 

Food makers and retailers must start getting ready for the new rule. “There is a genuine need for detectability, however, for straightforwardness and permeability into the [entire] production network,” says Jim Hardeman, head buying official and leader promoting official with CMX, the seller of a product stage for overseeing quality, chance, and consistency.

Numerous food vendors, including retailers, merchants, and cafés, need permeability past their level 1 providers. Presently they’ll have to refer to the beginning, as far as possible, back to the entire food production process. 

Currently, principles assist them with accomplishing that level of permeability, most strikingly the Global Location Number (GLN) framework laid out by GS1 US. It gives a unique key, a 13-digit number, for recognizing all gatherings and areas in a store network.

Free Consultation with AgTech experts

An expected 70% of the food business in the U.S. has taken on that norm, says Wiltse, yet it’s not as generally utilized in different nations, representing 20% of the country’s food supply. A GS1 US-consistent standardized identification can distinguish everything from the particular ranch, item type, and reap date to deliver date — data that opens up to each substance that handles the thing along the chain. At the essential food item or café end, programming permits dealers to filter the material data and decide if a given item is likely to review. The innovation makes the interaction somewhat direct in any event, for an eatery network with many areas and a broad rundown of fixings to make due.

By having the option to get to the exact beginning of a defiled food thing during a review, makers wouldn’t be guaranteed to need to obliterate all items that came from a specific homestead or locale. (That has frequently been the situation with delicate things like romaine lettuce.) “Presently, the expense is pinpointed down to the parcel level,” says Wiltse.

As burdensome as the execution of Rule 204 could appear to the food business, it will benefit customers. “A greater amount of them need straightforwardness,” Hardeman says. “They need to know where the food they’re purchasing comes from. “That is valuable for brand dedication.”

The FDA has thus started making a productive move in broadening food production and safety standards for the betterment of the world. As a result, the industry executes supply chain processes in a much more professional way, keeping everything in check, especially FTA. 


About Folio3 AgTech Practice

Folio3 is a Silicon Valley based Digital Transformation partner for entrepreneurs and Fortune 500 companies with a special focus on digitization of Agriculture, Production and Companion Animal industry. Having worked with some of the world’s leading animal health companies, cattle associations, cow-calf operators, cattle feeders, beef processors and beef marketing companies, we have the design and development expertise required to help you digitize your manual procedures and practices, whether you’re a farm or a ranch owner, veterinarian, feedlot manager, nutritionist, or processing plant owner, we have got you covered.

Search AgTech Blogs

Got a Project For Us?

Related Posts

Sign Up for Newsletter

Take the Next Step towards Your Digital
Transformation Journey